Beta-Blocker Therapy After Revascularized AMI With Preserved LVEF: Insights From the REDUCE-AMI Trial

Jenna Skowronski, MD; Shelley A. Hall, MD, FACC; Onyedika J. Ilonze, MD, FACC

Disclosures

December 11, 2024

Beta-blockers have historically been considered a cornerstone of therapy after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), independent of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The REDUCE-AMI (Randomized Evaluation of Decreased Usage of Beta-Blockers After Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial was a registry-based, international, open-label, multicenter randomized trial designed to assess the impact of beta-blocker therapy after revascularized AMI in patients with preserved LVEF in the current era of widely available percutaneous coronary revascularization and medical therapy.[1] The primary endpoint was a composite of death from any cause or new myocardial infarction (MI).

In the REDUCE-AMI trial, 5,020 patients with AMI with preserved LVEF (>50%) were randomized 1:1 to receive beta blockage with oral bisoprolol titrated to ≥5 mg daily or metoprolol titrated to ≥100 mg daily versus usual care. After a mean follow-up of 3.5 years, the primary endpoint of the composite of death from any cause or new MI occurred in 7.9% of patients in the beta-blocker group and in 8.3% in the no–beta-blocker group (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.16; p = 0.64).

The REDUCE-AMI trial results showed that, in patients with AMI who underwent percutaneous revascularization and had preserved LVEF, beta-blockers did not result in a lower incidence of composite death or new AMI, all-cause death, AMI, or heart failure hospitalization. Limitations included: 1) this was not a blinded study because patients not in the beta-blocker arm did not receive placebo, which may have introduced bias; 2) there are questions about the overall generalizability of this study given that it mostly enrolled patients in Sweden; 3) there was significant crossover between groups at 1 year, with 14% of patients randomized to usual care on beta-blockers in addition to difficulty assessing medical adherence; and 4) the clinical endpoints were assessed via registry data and were not centrally adjudicated. Overall, the results of the REDUCE-AMI challenge traditional medical practice, although beta-blockers should be considered for patients with AMI who have other clinical indications.

Comments

3090D553-9492-4563-8681-AD288FA52ACE
Comments on Medscape are moderated and should be professional in tone and on topic. You must declare any conflicts of interest related to your comments and responses. Please see our Commenting Guide for further information. We reserve the right to remove posts at our sole discretion.

processing....